Who represents the better value... Romelu Lukaku or Alvaro Morata?
Alvaro Morata is on the brink of joining Chelsea for up to £70m, while rivals Man Utd signed Romelu Lukaku earlier this month for a fee that could rise to £90m.
Sky Bet
Manchester Utd v Manchester City
But which move represents the best value?
Sky sources understand the initial fee for Real Madrid striker Morata is £58m, but if all add ons are realised, the total fee could rise to about £70m.
United, meanwhile, signed Lukaku from Everton for a fee that Sky sources understand could eventually rise to £90m. Jose Mourinho's side also held off late competition from Chelsea for the Belgium striker's signature.
Does Lukaku's Premier League experience count for more? Or does the element of unknown about Morata make him the more exciting signing?
We've been asking you for your opinion on the two big moves ahead of the Premier League season.
Vote for yourself here, and see the best reader replies below...
For Morata
Shola Ojoawo @IfemiShola - Chelsea have gotten what has been missing in the team, a box striker. He can shoot from all angles, hold up play, good with his head
Arkin Sachdev @ArkinSachdev - Chelsea have got a well-rounded player who can play with his back to goal as well as facing it. The way we play, he is perfect for our system
Damian Wilson @mboasem - Clearly Chelsea had the better deal. Morata has tasted the La Liga and the Serie A and performed. He has a better first touch.
Comments
Post a Comment